Barnaby Ward’s Sixteen Miles to Merricks and Other Works
I’ve mancrushed on Ward before. Picking up his graphic novel was worth the money. Now where’s the next one, Barnaby?

Technical artist. Blogging since 1999.
Barnaby Ward’s Sixteen Miles to Merricks and Other Works
I’ve mancrushed on Ward before. Picking up his graphic novel was worth the money. Now where’s the next one, Barnaby?
So many more captioned YouTube videos at YouTubeCapper.Blogspot.com. Create your own embeddable captioned YouTube videos here.
Oh god, the monkey was a suicide bomber!


“Forget it, baby. It’s… Chinatown.”
“Me?”

I’ve added a second mode to the YouTube Captioning Thing. The original version allowed you to create a running commentary beneath any embeddable YouTube video. The new version has a second mode where the captions appear directly on top of the video. Here’s a demo:
*crowd cheers*

*puff puff*

This is a cheat sheet for cramming the basic phonemes of Korean. It’s a printable PDF, and a first draft. I’ve noted the approximate sounds in English and Hindi, because Hindi has a better phonetic alphabet. It’s mostly based on this guy’s YouTube video. (He doesn’t give his name, and I’m not going to look for it.) I number the order of the phonemes in the syllable blocks, rather than using his LRB/TMB system. Corrections welcome.
Stitched together in Hugin from 17 camera phone pictures. Miller Cylindrical projection.
Rockland, ME. A much balmier 20°, but breezy.
Stitched together in Hugin from 13 camera phone pictures. Stereographic projection.
Union, ME. Air temperature about 10° F.
Stitched together in Hugin from 24 camera phone pictures. Stereographic projection.
Logicomix: An Epic Search for Truth
Does a book listing all non-self-referential books contain itself? A book about the founding of modern logic has no right to be such a compulsive page-turner.
Sneering, populist climate science denialism from a self-described Libertarian is nothing shocking, but it should be a bit beneath the New York Times science page. I’m beginning to think the best thing to do is just to sneer back, and keep asking questions about those lovely secondhand robes they’ve bought from the Emperor.
Leaving aside the question of whether libertarian philosophy is even flexible enough to mount a response to a problem with personalized rewards but socialized consequences, let’s make sure we understand why this is denialism, and not skepticism. Climate change “denialism” relies not on a single set of arguments, but on several tiers, whose only commonality is a defense of inaction on the issue:
The scientific consensus on plate tectonics is about as old as I am. It’s been around much longer than that, much like our understanding of the greenhouse effect. To certain generations of Americans, though, the Earth never moved. The geological revolution was a boon to oil and gas exploration, and the free market as a whole. If modern climate science had such a rosy picture to offer, would such an unfortunate gap have ever been opened in the last ten years between scientific consensus and public perception?
No existential threat to the civilized world exists from fundamentalist terrorists. We do not call the madman Emperor, and we do not call the criminal Nemesis. Were terrorists able to threaten the existence of our values, the existence of our institutions of law, or even the lives of any great portion of us, they would not require the tools of cowardice. If Cheney, Beck, Limbaugh, Palin or O’Reilly will argue otherwise, let them do so, and let them stand against evidence. Fear will always be sold cheap by shameful men. Defend reason. Keep calm, and carry on.